Numbers 1-17
So here we are in the book of Numbers. It's been a while since I've had the time to write, so there's a lot to cover. This entry will just focus on Numbers, and then I'll write more posts to cover Psalms and Mark.
The Book of Numbers has it difficult parts (namely, the parts full of numbers), but at least it returns to more of a narrative structure than Leviticus. Coming from a theatrical tradition, I much prefer a linear plot. I find many of the passages in Numbers quite difficult to swallow. In particular the story of the Revolt of Korah found in Chapter 16 and the trail by ordeal found in Chapter 5. I'll start with the Revolt.
Communal punishment is an idea quite prominent in the Old Testament and quite removed from our modern, American idea of each individual being responsible for his own actions. It seems quite harsh to us that the whole of Korah's family is obliterated. God has the wives, children, and families of the rebels stand outside their houses and literally has the earth consume them. They are sent alive to Sheol. That seems harsh. I remember in Sunday morning Bible study discussing how God will punish generations for the transgressions of their ancestors. It's an idea that's difficult for me. I like to look at it from the opposite side, though. By living in a community where everyone is responsible for everyone's actions, we have a built in support system. We never have to go it alone. There are standards and laws and expectations for the community, and when one community member fails, we all fail. By like token, when one member succeeds, we all succeed. I see some comfort and strength in that.
I find the story in Chapter 5, though, incredibly difficult. It's not one I've ever read before. I guess my Sunday school teachers as a child didn't think it appropriate for children. Better yet, maybe, like me, they just don't know what the heck to make of it. It's a truly awful, disgusting, unjust, ignorant, disgraceful way of dealing with anyone. To summarize, if a woman is even
suspected of unfaithfulness (and notice it's only for a woman--there is nothing to try an unfaithful man), She's forced to drink a poison that will cause her uterus to discharge and leave her sterile. It's painful, messy, violating, and humiliating. All because her husband was suspicious. Note that this is if there is no witness and they are unsure if she's guilty. If she fails, she's left humiliated and sterile. If she is unaffected by the poison, it's still painful and humiliating. What the hell? This is the law sent from God? I don't think so. If that's really divine law sent from God, I don't want to serve that God. It's sick. More than anything I've read in the Bible, this passage proves to me that the Bible cannot be taken literally. This is clearly the writing of a male dominated society that sees women as nothing more than possessions using the name of the Lord to do their own will. The same logic that's used today by crazy zealots who kill people or humiliate people in God's name. It's a direct violation of the commandment to not use the Lord's name in vain.
So what do we take from this? Do we discount the entirety of the Old Testament? I don't think we can. I cannot, and will not, defend this sick-o passage from the Bible, but I also can't throw out the baby with the bath water. Without justifying or defending the cruelty of ancient peoples, I must see it from their world view. The discerning reader can find, through reason and the Holy Spirit, the truth in Holy Scripture. That means we must, to some extent, pick and choose what we think is divinely inspired and what is crap. And the crap must stay intact with the scriptures so that we can understand how they were written. These were laws and stories written at a specific time in history for a specific audience. It's our job to discern what that means for us today.
In the Episcopal Church we talk about the three-legged stool of faith. I think I've written about this before on this blog. God gives us Holy Scripture and Tradition to guide our faith, but he also gives us human reason. The ability to think. To discern. To know it's wrong to poison a woman who might maybe have cheated on her husband, even though I have no proof to that end. I lean heavily on that third leg of reason. I wish more people did.